Of the populist, by the populist, and for the populist
Populism is on the rise. A proof of this is has been reported by The Guardian. According to their statistics*, populism is experiencing a recent surge of popularity. From only 300 articles published about it in 1998, it has more than tripled into 1,000 articles in 2015 and almost 2,000 articles in 2016.
According to this graph from Jordan Kyle and Limor Gultchin, there are more populists now than there were back in the 1990s:

A few examples of current political leaders that are famous for being populists are Donald Trump of the United States, Marine Le Pen of France, Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines, and Thaksin Shinawatra of Thailand.
But what exactly is a populist, and so what if populism is rising? Why should we be concerned about that? A populist, according to experts Cas Mudde and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, believes that politics is an expression of the will of the people, and that the people should fight the elite that has corrupted government.
However, Mudde and Kaltwasser cleared up that a person is not automatically a populist just because he or she is against the corrupt elite. What labels a candidate as populist is how he or she markets himself or herself as the only possible representative of the people and that the “others” (other candidates) are not and whoever votes for them cannot be counted as “real people”.
Let us take Trump, for example. During his campaign rally, he proclaimed:
“The most important thing is the unification of the people – because the other people don’t mean anything.”*

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of Turkey said the same thing, albeit in different words:
“We are the people,” and proceeded to ask his critics, “Who are you?”*

Another example is Andrés Manuel López Obrador of Mexico. After losing the 2006 elections, he protested against the results:
“The victory of the right is morally impossible” and said that the “legitimate president of Mexico” could only be him.

To summarize it into a single sentence: populism has a noble belief (or it makes us believe that they have noble beliefs), however, its problem lies in its anti-pluralism and exclusionary politics.
This poses a problem for democracy because by saying such, they insert seeds of doubt into the minds of the citizens in the existing democratic institutions. They make citizens become discouraged to vote because why will they vote if elections are rigged anyway?
Sometimes, it is true that there is are corrupt elites who manipulate the political climate of a nation, and the populists are right in this regard: the corruption should stop. However, it is also possible that populism has only been used as a strategy to get the votes of the masses. As a consequence, the problem is the same, only that the “populist” is now part of the corrupt elite, even more so because we cannot differentiate the authentic from the inauthentic because they both use the same words.
Instead of being “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” there is a risk that it will become “of the populist, by the populist, and for the populist.”
Notes
*These statistics only count the articles published by and on The Guardian.
*Example from Jan-Werner Müller’s book titled “The Rise and Rise of Populism”.
*Example from Jan-Werner Müller’s book titled “What is Populism?”
References
- Gultchin, L. & Kyle, J. (2018). Populists in Power Around the World. In Institute for Global Change.
- Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C.R. (2013). Exclusionary vs Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. In Government and Opposition 48, no. 2: 147–174.
- Müller, Jan-Werner. (2017). The Rise and Rise of Populism? In The Age of Perplexity. Rethinking The World we Knew. Madrid: BBVA.
- Müller, J. W. (2017). What is populism?. UK: Penguin.






